Source of lawful income in New Jersey housing law: vouchers, income tests and the 2026 changes
New Jersey bans refusing renters over vouchers or other lawful income. What the January 2026 law added, the tenant-share income rule and ad wording.
Rules covered through . Sources and corrections.
The short version
- 1New Jersey's Law Against Discrimination bars owners, brokers, salespersons and lenders from treating people differently because of their source of lawful income, such as Section 8 vouchers, rental assistance, disability or veterans' benefits, or child support.
- 2P.L. 2025, c.251, effective January 12, 2026, wrote a definition of that term into the statute and states expressly that refusing a lawful source as payment, or applying an income test that is not based only on the tenant's share of the rent, is illegal.
- 3Lawful source of income is protected by the NJ LAD and is not itself a named federal FHA class. Ads such as "No Section 8" violate the LAD. Separate federal protections can also apply, including when the conduct discriminates on a federally protected ground.
What source of lawful income means
New Jersey's Law Against Discrimination (the LAD) bars housing discrimination based on a person's "source of lawful income used for rental or mortgage payments." In plain terms, a landlord, seller or agent can look at whether an applicant can pay, but not at where the lawful money comes from. A housing voucher, a disability check and a paycheck are treated the same way.
Since January 12, 2026, the statute defines the term itself. N.J.S.A. 10:5-5(yy), added by P.L. 2025, c.251, says source of lawful income means any source of income lawfully obtained, or any source of rental or mortgage payment lawfully obtained, including:
- Federal, State or local public assistance or housing assistance vouchers or funds, including Section 8 housing choice vouchers, temporary rental assistance programs and State rental assistance programs.
- Rental assistance funds provided by a nonprofit organization.
- Federal, State or local benefits, including disability benefits and veterans' benefits.
- Court-ordered payments, including child support, alimony or damages.
- Any form of lawful currency, whether it is tendered as cash, check, money order or other lawful means.
The words "including, but not limited to" matter. The list gives examples; it is not the outer edge. If the money is lawfully obtained and will pay the rent or mortgage, the source is protected.
This is a New Jersey rule. The federal Fair Housing Act protects seven classes (race, color, religion, national origin, sex, familial status and disability, which the statute calls "handicap"), and source of income is not one of them. Read 42 U.S.C. 3604 and you will not find it. For an exam question about protected classes, identify lawful source of income as an NJ LAD protection rather than a named federal FHA class. Do not conclude that a voucher refusal can never violate federal law: discrimination on a federally protected ground or separate requirements for federally assisted housing can also be involved. Our LAD vs Fair Housing Act comparison covers the other classes New Jersey adds.
Quick check
Saves to your topic scoreA New Jersey landlord rejects an applicant because part of her rent would be paid from a nonprofit organization's rental assistance fund. Which statement is correct?
Reveal answer (review only)
Answer: The answer is B, The rejection violates the NJ Law Against Discrimination.
N.J.S.A. 10:5-5(yy) defines source of lawful income to include rental assistance funds provided by a nonprofit organization, and 10:5-12(g) bars refusing to rent because of it.
Why the other answers do not fit
- A. The rejection is lawful because only government vouchers are protected
- The definition expressly names nonprofit rental assistance, not just government programs.
- C. The rejection is lawful unless the unit was already approved for Section 8
- Protection does not depend on any prior Section 8 approval of the unit.
- D. The rejection violates the federal Fair Housing Act but not New Jersey law
- Source of income is not a federal Fair Housing Act class; the protection comes from the New Jersey LAD.
Remember: Lawful money for rent is protected in NJ, whoever pays it.
Question ID: bq-46-1
Revealing the answer makes this attempt review only.
What changed in January 2026
P.L. 2025, c.251 was approved on January 12, 2026 and took effect immediately. Source of income discrimination was already illegal before then. The Senate Community and Urban Affairs Committee's December 4, 2025 statement on the bill (A4841) says that although this form of discrimination is "currently prohibited by the LAD," it "is not articulated consistently throughout this existing statute," and that the bill defines the term and states expressly that the protection covers income used for rental or mortgage payments. An October 7, 2020 Attorney General fair housing letter to housing providers had also said income standards must be "based only on the portion of the rent to be paid by the tenant." What changed in 2026 is that these rules now sit in the statute's own words.
| Topic | Before January 12, 2026 | After January 12, 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | No definition of "source of lawful income" in 10:5-5 | New definition in 10:5-5(yy) naming vouchers, rental assistance, nonprofit aid, benefits, court-ordered payments and any lawful form of payment |
| Refusing to rent or sell (10:5-12(g)(4) owners, (h)(4) brokers and salespersons) | Barred refusing because of the source of lawful income or the source of any lawful rent payment | Same ban, plus express examples: refusing to accept a lawful source as payment, and applying a minimum income requirement or financial standard not based exclusively on the tenant's portion of the rent |
| Minimum income screening | Covered by DCR guidance (2020), not spelled out in 10:5-12 | Written into 10:5-12(g)(4) and (h)(4) |
| Ads, statements and terms (10:5-12(g)(1) to (3), (h)(1) to (3)) | Already included source of lawful income | Unchanged in substance |
| Findings, DCR powers and AG duties (10:5-3, 10:5-6, 10:5-8) | Did not name source of lawful income | Now list source of lawful income used for rental or mortgage payments |
Two things the 2026 law does not do, despite what you may read online. It does not mention credit scores, credit history or credit checks; those words do not appear in the act. And it does not set an income multiplier. It controls what any multiplier is applied to, not how big it is.
Who the rule binds
The LAD reaches each player in a housing deal through a separate paragraph of N.J.S.A. 10:5-12:
- Owners, landlords and anyone with the right to sell or rent, under 10:5-12(g).
- Real estate brokers, salespersons and their employees or agents, under 10:5-12(h). The text is the same as the owner paragraph, so an agent who carries out a landlord's "no vouchers" instruction commits the violation personally.
- Lenders and other financial institutions, under 10:5-12(i)(4), which bars discriminating because of the source of any lawful income or the source of any lawful rent payment.
The LAD keeps two narrow owner-occupied rental exemptions: the other unit of a two-family house the owner lives in, and rooms in a one-family home the owner or occupant lives in. Neither applies to publicly assisted housing, as defined in N.J.S.A. 10:5-5. The LAD vs Fair Housing Act post lays them out. Even there, the DCR's advertising rule, N.J.A.C. 13:9-1.1, says in subsection (b) that it applies to those two rentals, so a discriminatory ad is out regardless. The owner may be exempt from the refusal rule; the ad is not. If you are involved as a licensee, assume there is no exemption to lean on.
Minimum income rules and the tenant's share
Most landlords screen with an income test, often "income of three times the rent." Under 10:5-12(g)(4) and (h)(4), when an applicant's rent is partly covered by a voucher or other assistance, any minimum income requirement or financial standard must be "based exclusively on the portion of the rent to be paid by the tenant." Here is how to apply it:
- Start with the full monthly rent.
- Subtract the part the voucher or assistance program will pay.
- What is left is the tenant's portion.
- Apply the landlord's usual multiplier to the tenant's portion only.
- Compare the applicant's income to that number, and screen everyone else with the same multiplier on the rent they will pay.
Example with illustrative numbers. A unit rents for $1,900 a month. The applicant's voucher pays $1,300, so his share is $600. The landlord's standard is three times the rent. The lawful test is 3 x $600 = $1,800 a month in income, not 3 x $1,900 = $5,700. Applying $5,700 would screen out nearly every voucher holder, which is exactly what the statute forbids.
This is not a theoretical risk for agents. In a February 10, 2025 announcement of 20 rental assistance cases, the Attorney General said the DCR found probable cause that a Jersey City real estate broker violated the LAD by telling a voucher holder the applicant would not qualify because the landlord required monthly income of three times the rent, without accounting for the portion the voucher would pay. That was under the old text and the 2020 guidance. Since January 2026, the rule is written into 10:5-12(h)(4) itself. A probable cause finding is not a final ruling, but it is the step before one.
Quick check
Saves to your topic scoreA New Jersey apartment rents for $2,200 a month. The applicant's voucher pays $1,650 and she pays the rest. The landlord requires monthly income of 2.5 times the rent. What income may the landlord lawfully require of her?
Reveal answer (review only)
Answer: The answer is D, $1,375.
Under N.J.S.A. 10:5-12(g)(4), an income standard must be based exclusively on the tenant's portion. $2,200 minus $1,650 is $550, and 2.5 x $550 = $1,375.
Why the other answers do not fit
- A. $5,500
- $5,500 is 2.5 times the full rent, which ignores the voucher and is not allowed.
- B. $4,125
- $4,125 is 2.5 times the voucher's share, the wrong part of the rent.
- C. $550
- $550 is the tenant's share itself, before the landlord's multiplier.
Remember: Subtract the voucher first, then multiply.
Question ID: bq-46-2
Revealing the answer makes this attempt review only.
Scenarios agents actually run into
| Situation | Lawful? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Tasha calls about a listing and says she has a Section 8 voucher. The landlord tells you he does not "do Section 8." | No | Refusing to accept a lawful source as payment is named in 10:5-12(g)(4). You cannot carry out the instruction under 10:5-12(h). |
| The landlord says he will take the voucher but does not want to deal with the inspection and paperwork. | No | The DCR's source of income fact sheet says that reason does not justify refusing a voucher holder. |
| Owen's rent will be paid partly by a nonprofit's rental assistance fund. | Protected | Nonprofit rental assistance is named in the 10:5-5(yy) definition. |
| Rosa's income is child support and her disability benefits. The landlord wants "employment income only." | No | Court-ordered payments and disability benefits are listed sources of lawful income. Count them like wages. |
| A voucher holder's share is $500 and the landlord's rule is income of 2.5 times the rent. | Yes, if applied as $1,250 | 2.5 x $500 = $1,250. The test must use the tenant's portion exclusively. |
| The landlord wants every applicant, voucher or not, to pass the same credit check. | The 2026 law is silent | The act does not mention credit history. Our advice: apply the same written criteria to everyone, keep income tests on the tenant's share, and ask your broker before using any standard that would screen out assisted applicants. |
Our practical advice for any listing you handle: get the landlord's screening criteria in writing at the start, check the income test against the tenant-share rule, and if the owner gives a source of income instruction, explain the law, decline, tell your broker and document it. Criminal history screening has its own statute; see the Fair Chance in Housing Act guide.
Ad wording that crosses the line
Paragraphs (g)(3) and (h)(3) of 10:5-12 bar any ad or statement that expresses a limitation based on source of lawful income, and N.J.A.C. 13:9-1.1 applies the same ban to print and electronic listings, overt or subtle. The DCR's source of income fact sheet gives these as violations:
- "No Section 8"
- "Sorry, no CVERAP"
- "TRA not accepted"
- "This property not approved for Section 8"
The DCR's 2020 letter to housing providers says the same rule covers print ads and online postings. Watch softer versions too: "must have job income," "no programs," or "income 3x rent, no exceptions" on a listing where assisted applicants will apply. Our suggestion for rental ad copy is to describe the property, the rent and the screening criteria you can lawfully apply, and to add a line such as "All lawful sources of income, including housing vouchers, are accepted." For the Commission's own ad rules, such as naming your brokerage, see NJ real estate advertising rules.
Quick check
Saves to your topic scoreAn owner lives in one unit of her two-family house and asks a salesperson to list the other unit for rent with the line "No vouchers." What should the salesperson do?
Reveal answer (review only)
Answer: The answer is C, Refuse the wording, because New Jersey's advertising ban covers this rental and binds the salesperson.
N.J.A.C. 13:9-1.1(b) applies the ban on discriminatory ads, including limits based on source of lawful income, even to the rental of a unit in an owner-occupied two-family house, and N.J.S.A. 10:5-12(h)(3) separately bars brokers and salespersons from publishing such statements.
Why the other answers do not fit
- A. Run the ad, because an owner-occupied two-family rental is exempt from the LAD
- The owner-occupied exemption does not reach discriminatory ads under the DCR's advertising rule.
- B. Run the ad, because the federal Fair Housing Act does not protect source of income
- Federal law being silent does not excuse a New Jersey violation; the stricter state law applies.
- D. Run the ad only if the employing broker signs off on it
- A broker cannot approve an unlawful ad, and the broker would share the violation.
Remember: Exempt rental or not, a "no vouchers" ad is illegal in NJ.
Question ID: bq-46-3
Revealing the answer makes this attempt review only.
Complaints and penalties
A person who is refused can file with the Division on Civil Rights within 180 days of the alleged violation, or in Superior Court within 2 years. The DCR takes complaints online through NJBIAS or at 1-833-NJDCR4U. On top of other relief, N.J.S.A. 10:5-14.1a lets the Director impose civil penalties:
| Respondent's record | Maximum penalty per violation |
|---|---|
| No adjudicated violation in the 5 years before the complaint | $10,000 |
| One other adjudicated violation in the prior 5 years | $25,000 |
| Two or more adjudicated violations in the prior 7 years | $50,000 |
These are maximums set after a violation is adjudicated, not automatic fines. Damages, attorney fees and other relief can come on top. The DCR enforces this class actively: the Attorney General announced probable cause findings in eight source of income cases in October 2023, enforcement actions in ten rental assistance cases in October 2024, and findings or settlements in 20 more in February 2025, with brokers and agents among the respondents.
How it shows up on the exam
The New Jersey portion of the PSI outline lists the Law Against Discrimination, so expect a state question built on one of three ideas: a voucher holder is protected in New Jersey, an income test uses the tenant's share, and an ad cannot limit sources of income. On the national portion, remember that source of income is not a federal class.
- If the question says "under the federal Fair Housing Act," source of income is not protected.
- If it says "in New Jersey" or "under the LAD," it is, for owners, agents and lenders.
- For any income math with a voucher, subtract the voucher first, then multiply.
- Any answer that lets an agent follow a "no vouchers" instruction is wrong.
Drill the rest of the LAD in the Law Against Discrimination study guide, then test yourself with a full practice exam.
The full NJ question bank, in the app
Launching soon. Free to start, $59.99 once at launch for everything.
FAQ
Can a landlord in New Jersey refuse Section 8?
No. Section 8 housing choice vouchers are a source of lawful income under the LAD, and refusing to accept a lawful source as payment is prohibited. The only carve-outs are the owner-occupied two-family and rooms rentals in N.J.S.A. 10:5-5(n), and even those owners cannot run a "No Section 8" ad.
What changed in New Jersey source of income law in January 2026?
P.L. 2025, c.251, approved and effective January 12, 2026, added a statutory definition of source of lawful income and expressly bars refusing a lawful source as payment or applying an income test not based exclusively on the tenant's share of the rent. Source of income discrimination was already illegal; the law made the rules explicit.
How do you calculate a minimum income requirement for a voucher holder in NJ?
Subtract the voucher's share from the rent, then apply the landlord's multiplier to what the tenant pays. With a $1,900 rent and a $1,300 voucher, a three-times rule means $1,800 a month, not $5,700.
Is source of income protected under the federal Fair Housing Act?
No. The federal Act protects race, color, religion, national origin, sex, familial status and disability. Source of income protection in New Jersey comes from the state LAD.
Does the NJ source of income law cover child support and disability benefits?
Yes. The definition in N.J.S.A. 10:5-5(yy) names disability and veterans' benefits and court-ordered payments such as child support, alimony and damages.
Can a New Jersey rental ad say "No Section 8"?
No. The LAD and the DCR's advertising rule, N.J.A.C. 13:9-1.1, bar ads that limit lawful sources of income. The DCR lists "No Section 8" and "This property not approved for Section 8" as violations.
Does the 2026 NJ law ban credit checks for voucher holders?
The act does not mention credit history or credit scores. It does require any minimum income requirement or financial standard to be based exclusively on the tenant's portion of the rent.
What is the penalty for source of income discrimination in New Jersey?
Under N.J.S.A. 10:5-14.1a, up to $10,000 per violation for a first adjudicated violation, up to $25,000 with one prior in 5 years, and up to $50,000 with two or more in 7 years, plus other relief.
Sources
- P.L. 2025, c.251: N.J.S.A. 10:5-5(yy) and 10:5-12(g), (h), (i) as amended, approved January 12, 2026
- Senate Community and Urban Affairs Committee statement to A4841 [1R], December 4, 2025
- NJ Division on Civil Rights: source of lawful income fact sheet (2020)
- NJ Attorney General: October 7, 2020 fair housing letter to housing providers
- N.J.A.C. 13:9-1.1: discriminatory real estate advertising (Cornell LII)
- NJ Law Against Discrimination, DCR courtesy compilation, including N.J.S.A. 10:5-5(n) and 10:5-14.1a penalties
- HUD OIG: source-of-income discrimination and federal housing protections (August 13, 2025)